Lost Password? No account yet? Register
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color

New Kosova Report

Thursday
Jan 08th
'Multi-ethnic' society: a technical arrangement PDF Print E-mail
By Albin Kurti   
Friday, 12 September 2008
ImageRecently a ‘technical arrangement’ was signed between UNMIK and the EU Planning Team, which is responsible for setting up the EULEX mission in Kosova. It was called ‘technical’ (as it is) only because this was made possible by the earlier political agreement between the two missions. This political agreement is evident in the contents of the ‘technical arrangement’.

In the preamble, it states that it is ‘to facilitate the deployment of EULEX within the framework of UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) and the overall authority of the United Nations.’ This confirms that the future mission will operate as a pillar inside the UN so there will be no contradiction between the two missions which will operate on the basis of Resolution 1244, whilst the Kosova government will function according to the Constitution. In addition, clause ten states that the arrangement is valid for one year which indicates that UNMIK, despite all the promises and propaganda, is not leaving. Instead, as it gathers a new mission under its umbrella, it is growing in size.’

This week there has been an interesting shift in the definition of ‘multi-ethnic’ in Kosova. When the term was placed in the constitution and used in the Ahtisaari Plan, it was used for political reasons to imply that Kosova is a country in which live many ethnic groups of roughly equal sizes and thus, it is a country without one dominant identity. The term was being used to deny the reality that 95% of the population of Kosova is Albanian. In practice, the term ‘multi-ethnic’ has been used to justify the implementation of the Ahtisaari Plan, which focuses solely on the rights of the Serb minority, treats Kosova as a Serb-Albanian entity and divides it on this basis. In this sense, the term ‘multi-ethnic’ has ignored the existence of Turks, Bosniaks, Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian in Kosova. It was simply a political tool to pacify Serbia and to ease the path for the creation of a new ‘Kosova’ identity.

Now Tim Guildmann, the head of the OSCE Mission in Kosova has altered the interpretation of this term multi-ethnic in order to make another political move. He is quoted as saying, “Kosovo is not some-thing that we can call a multiethnic society. There are different communities living in Kosovo, but a multiethnic society would imply integration, mutual under-standing, tolerance, and co-existence. And we are not seeing this.” Now multi-ethnic is being used to refer to the relations between groups of people and not the number and size of the groups which constitute society. It is being used now to imply that the lack of integration is an internal problem to Kosova and that responsibility lies with Prishtina and not with Belgrade.

The report by the OSCE which supports Guildman’s claim explains the lack of integration in Kosova, but it does not explain why this exists. There is no mention of the active and aggressive policy that Serbia has been pursuing within and outside Kosova in order to undermine its independence and territorial integrity and to prevent the Serb minority from integrating institutionally and socially. The report makes no mention at all of the shooting and murder by Serbs of a Ukrainian police officer on 17th March. When it does refer to the burning of the border posts on 19th February and the occupation of the court house in Mitrovica on 17th March, there is no mention of Serbia’s involvement. There is instead a vague reference to the ‘continued stalemate’ between Prishtina and Belgrade, which implies that both sides are equally to blame for this failure to integrate. This attempt to hide behind the mask of so-called ‘objectivity’ simply removes all political responsibility from Belgrade. It is not fair or just to hold Kosova accountable for the non–integration of the Serb community when this is made impossible by Belgrade’s policies inside Kosova and the international community’s tolerance of these very same policies.

 

Albin Kurti leads Vetëvendosje (Self-determination) Movement, which opposes international administration of Kosovo. 

Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Translate article



Members






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Support us!

Support us!

 

Signup for our newsletter!

Newsletter




Quick Vote

Have you or do you plan to go skiing in Kosovo this Winter?
 

advertisement



Columns

Blackbird
Image United nations I said, “Surely the world is getting better.” She frowned and began listing the rea...
Vetėvendosje!
Image Review of Vetevendosje activities in 2008 Opposing EULEX The year began with opposition to EULEX on the basis that this new international ...
Henry H. Perritt
Image Kosovo government is right to resist pressure The Government of Kosovo is right to resist the “Six-point plan,” which nullifies the ...
Arlind V. Bytyqi
Image A questionable authority Uncertain over their own mandate, with nuances of ridiculousness resulting from their behavior of a ...