Albin Kurti
To understand where Kosovo is being taken, it is necessary to understand the Ahtisaari Plan. This plan is mentioned eight times in the Declaration of Independence, while the word independence is mentioned just three times, including the title of the Declaration. This Plan is within the Constitution of Kosovo whose Clause 143 notes that the Ahtisaari Plan is higher than the Constitution. So, what do the contents of this Plan tell us about the above question?
Clause 1.1 of this Plan, at the very beginning, states that Kosovo shall be a multi-ethnic society. However, in the core of multi-ethnicity is ethnicity. Many different ethnicities living side by side make multi-ethnicity. This is how Ahtisaari conceived it. Because he did not aspire to integrate communities. His starting point is ethnicity, whilst his aspiration is the coexistence of these communities beside each other (and not integrated together). Therefore, decentralization, cultural heritage, representation, participation and decision making in political institutions is completely built on an ethnic basis. The Ahtisaari Plan does not make Kosovo Kosovar, but it makes it Albanian – Serb; it does not make the people of Kosovo into the Kosovar nation, but it divides them into Albanian and Serb national communities (and formally also four others).
The constitutive unit of the Ahtisaari Plan is not the Kosovar or the citizen. The constitutive unit is the national community. With the Ahtisaari Plan, Kosovo will not become a nation-state while its people will not become an ethnic-nation or a citizens-nation. Kosovo will become an Albanian-Serb country, where Albanians and Serbs live divided territorially from each other. Eventually the Albanian and Serb politicians will be together in the systems institutions, but not ordinary Albanians or Serbs. (In fact, this is the international answer to ethnic cleansing because the so-called ethnic difference is seen as the cause of ethnic cleansing and not the hegemony of Milosevic's Serbia. This certainly has suited Serbia which after the end of the war was interested to territorialize the presence of Serbs in Kosovo as the demographic minority that they are). Naturally, this approach perpetuates international rule in Kosovo, which is interpreted as necessary precisely in order to unite Albanians and Serbs, since their uniting is believed to be a new war. The Albanian-Serb dichotomy in the state of Kosovo keeps this state and its sovereignty always in the hands of internationals. The symptom of this is the fact that the word, 'international' is the word most used by the Ahtisaari Plan – altogether 126 times. The word 'Serb' is used 37 times whereas 'Albanian' twice: one time in Clause 1.6 when it discusses the Albanian language as one of the two official languages, and the other in a footnote in Clause 2.1 of Annex 7 which says 'non-Albanian communities.'
However the project of Kosovarism is evident in Kosovo. Are we dealing with a contradiction in this explanation? Who is the target of the project and why does it exist if the Ahtisaari Plan doesn't make Kosovo Kosovar but Albanian-Serb? The multi-ethnicity which the Ahtisaari Plan intends is very difficult to justify because in Kosovo there are about 92% Albanians and about 5% Serbs. In order to make multi-ethnicity more justifiable and sustainable, the Serb factor is being strengthened while the Albanian factor is being weakened. The Serb factor is being strengthened by letting Serbia inside Ko sovo, whilst the Albanian factor is weakened by throwing Albania outside Kosovo. Kosovarism is a political project which aims at distancing Albanians of Kosovo, as much as possible, from their Albanian identity and from Albania. Kosovarism is not a project being developed against Serbia, but against Albania. Kosovar nation building means de-nationalizing (only) Albanians whilst there is no state-building (in the strong meaning of the word) because the state remains in the hands of the internationals. On the other side of the same phenomenon, it is not accidental that there has been no registration of the population for nine years since the war. Their goal is to increase the number of Serbs including Serb refugees in Serbia that are or are not from Kosovo, but also to reduce the number of Albanians by not including the diaspora and even making it possible for them to declare themselves as Kosovar. This will result in a similar situation as Macedonia where for example some members of one family declare themselves Macedonian, whereas some others declare themselves Bulgarian.
Multi-ethnicity is in the function of Kosovarism or the imagined Kosovar nation (created by Albanians of Kosovo), but the opposite: Kosovarism is in the function of multi-ethnicity (the Albanian-Serb division of Kosovo). The Ahtisaari Plan (as the legal infrastructure and normative codification of multi-ethnicity) rests above the constitution of Kosovo (as the platform of the future imagined Kosovar nation) inside which it resides. Therefore, multi-ethnicity is above Kosovarism and is greater than it. Kosovarism is a way in which multi-ethnicity intends to weaken the dominant ethnicity for the sake of its own solidity. Multi-ethnicity is a concept and project that comes from above, whereas Kosovarism is just one of its branches. All is being done for the sake of a mechanical concept that exists in the highest offices and instances of politics and not for the sake of the people who live below. Hashim Thaçi and his ministers are like the agents of the film The Matrix. They are Kosovars, they are the machines that want to put their hands inside the bodies of people and towards their hearts in order to transform them into machines. While 'Kosovo' truly is the working title of the film 'Bosnia reloaded', another time . . .
Clause 1.1 of this Plan, at the very beginning, states that Kosovo shall be a multi-ethnic society. However, in the core of multi-ethnicity is ethnicity. Many different ethnicities living side by side make multi-ethnicity. This is how Ahtisaari conceived it. Because he did not aspire to integrate communities. His starting point is ethnicity, whilst his aspiration is the coexistence of these communities beside each other (and not integrated together). Therefore, decentralization, cultural heritage, representation, participation and decision making in political institutions is completely built on an ethnic basis. The Ahtisaari Plan does not make Kosovo Kosovar, but it makes it Albanian – Serb; it does not make the people of Kosovo into the Kosovar nation, but it divides them into Albanian and Serb national communities (and formally also four others).
The constitutive unit of the Ahtisaari Plan is not the Kosovar or the citizen. The constitutive unit is the national community. With the Ahtisaari Plan, Kosovo will not become a nation-state while its people will not become an ethnic-nation or a citizens-nation. Kosovo will become an Albanian-Serb country, where Albanians and Serbs live divided territorially from each other. Eventually the Albanian and Serb politicians will be together in the systems institutions, but not ordinary Albanians or Serbs. (In fact, this is the international answer to ethnic cleansing because the so-called ethnic difference is seen as the cause of ethnic cleansing and not the hegemony of Milosevic's Serbia. This certainly has suited Serbia which after the end of the war was interested to territorialize the presence of Serbs in Kosovo as the demographic minority that they are). Naturally, this approach perpetuates international rule in Kosovo, which is interpreted as necessary precisely in order to unite Albanians and Serbs, since their uniting is believed to be a new war. The Albanian-Serb dichotomy in the state of Kosovo keeps this state and its sovereignty always in the hands of internationals. The symptom of this is the fact that the word, 'international' is the word most used by the Ahtisaari Plan – altogether 126 times. The word 'Serb' is used 37 times whereas 'Albanian' twice: one time in Clause 1.6 when it discusses the Albanian language as one of the two official languages, and the other in a footnote in Clause 2.1 of Annex 7 which says 'non-Albanian communities.'
However the project of Kosovarism is evident in Kosovo. Are we dealing with a contradiction in this explanation? Who is the target of the project and why does it exist if the Ahtisaari Plan doesn't make Kosovo Kosovar but Albanian-Serb? The multi-ethnicity which the Ahtisaari Plan intends is very difficult to justify because in Kosovo there are about 92% Albanians and about 5% Serbs. In order to make multi-ethnicity more justifiable and sustainable, the Serb factor is being strengthened while the Albanian factor is being weakened. The Serb factor is being strengthened by letting Serbia inside Ko sovo, whilst the Albanian factor is weakened by throwing Albania outside Kosovo. Kosovarism is a political project which aims at distancing Albanians of Kosovo, as much as possible, from their Albanian identity and from Albania. Kosovarism is not a project being developed against Serbia, but against Albania. Kosovar nation building means de-nationalizing (only) Albanians whilst there is no state-building (in the strong meaning of the word) because the state remains in the hands of the internationals. On the other side of the same phenomenon, it is not accidental that there has been no registration of the population for nine years since the war. Their goal is to increase the number of Serbs including Serb refugees in Serbia that are or are not from Kosovo, but also to reduce the number of Albanians by not including the diaspora and even making it possible for them to declare themselves as Kosovar. This will result in a similar situation as Macedonia where for example some members of one family declare themselves Macedonian, whereas some others declare themselves Bulgarian.
Multi-ethnicity is in the function of Kosovarism or the imagined Kosovar nation (created by Albanians of Kosovo), but the opposite: Kosovarism is in the function of multi-ethnicity (the Albanian-Serb division of Kosovo). The Ahtisaari Plan (as the legal infrastructure and normative codification of multi-ethnicity) rests above the constitution of Kosovo (as the platform of the future imagined Kosovar nation) inside which it resides. Therefore, multi-ethnicity is above Kosovarism and is greater than it. Kosovarism is a way in which multi-ethnicity intends to weaken the dominant ethnicity for the sake of its own solidity. Multi-ethnicity is a concept and project that comes from above, whereas Kosovarism is just one of its branches. All is being done for the sake of a mechanical concept that exists in the highest offices and instances of politics and not for the sake of the people who live below. Hashim Thaçi and his ministers are like the agents of the film The Matrix. They are Kosovars, they are the machines that want to put their hands inside the bodies of people and towards their hearts in order to transform them into machines. While 'Kosovo' truly is the working title of the film 'Bosnia reloaded', another time . . .
Albin Kurti leads Vetëvendosje (Self-determination) Movement, which opposes international administration of Kosovo.
Outside Links:
Comments (8)
Orazio Vasta
said:
|
... E' condivisibile l'analisi di Albin Kurti,che rivendica alla Kosova la formazione di uno Stato nazionale kosovaro,e non di uno stato serbo-albanese,una sorta di grande GHETTO dove serbi e kosovari "convivono" separati,chiusi nel proprio spazio assegnatogli. Credo,che di fatto,una situazione del genere farebbe comodo all'Albania,che continuerebbe a tenere i kossovari come "albanesi" e non come popolo a se. E,in questo disegno,si spiega il massiccio arrivo di serbi nella zona "serba" della Repubblica Kosovara. Praticamente,l'amministrazione internazionale,con il tacito consenso di Tirana e Belgrado(COME MAI NON SI MANIFESTA PER "IL KOSOVO E' SERBO!"?)vuole smembrare il popolo kosovaro,attraverso la formazione "a spicchio" di uno stato multi-etnico,di una "multi-etnicità" che,da queste parti, non esiste.La Kosova non è la Bosnia! Orazio Vasta www.rarika-radice.blogspot.com |
|
Huh
said:
|
... @Aki Read it again. He's saying if K-Serbs can be Serbs, then why do only K-Albanians have to be Kosovars? Why do only Albanians have to shed their ethnic character in order to accomodate prima donna Serbs? Read it again. |
|
aki
said:
|
... This is absolutely pointless discussion!!! What is your solution Mr.Kurti? THat Albanians and Serbs should call themselves Kosovars??? That's funny! Why would they? Because the piece of land they live on is called Kosovo? When Kosovo was officially part of Serbia Albanians who lived in Kosovo never called themselves Serbians even though that was the name of the geographic location and a recognized country. Why didnt they? Maybe because of their ethnicity!!! So here we go again.... Is this the greatest problem in Kosova so far? |
|
BH_NYC
said:
|
... I do agree with most of what A. Kurti is saying. I still havent been able why and how did we come to agree to be given this strange blue flag which makes us look like an EU invented entity wiht no prior conections to the region whatsoever. Absolutely ridiculous. |
|
Shampie
said:
|
... Some good points here. It's true this plan aims to divide people and not integrate them, but we cannot ignore the fact that there was a war and Albanian and Serb communities will not work together in the near future. The Ahtisaari plan is good short term, but not good to rule over the constitution. And as for Kosovarism aimed at distancing Albanians of Kosovo from the ones in Albania, I don't think that will happen. The bond will only get stronger and that is already visible. |
|
Sebaneau
said:
|
... How come Macedonians can't understand Serbian when anyone who understands Serbian can understand Macedonian? Concerning Kosovo, multi-ethnicity is nothing but a denial of reality: Kosovo is mono-ethnically Albanian, just like Slovenia is mono-ethnically Slovenian. A double standard on that matter was never acceptable, only temporarily understandable on the part of those who nurtured the delusion that enough of Belgrade's politicians could be brought to accept reality as it is. Now that partition --a continued challenge to the 1945 borders -- is official Serbian policy, the Albanian character of Kosovo --acknowledged by Tito as well as by Dimitrije Tucović, and implicity admitted by the Belgrade politicians who refused to extend the common Serbian legal order to the conquered land in 1913, is the first reality which must be affirmed. Given the predominant political tradition in Serbia, which is to grab whatever territory the balance of forces allows you to grab no matter who lives there or to which state it has belonged for centuries, appeasement of Serbian territorial pretensions on mono-ethnically Albanian Kosovo is the opposite of what should be done. A long overdue message to the latest Nobel Peace Prizewinner: Mitrovica ei ole Ahvenanmaa, Kosovon serbit eivät ole suomenruotsalaisia. Mitrovica is not Åland, the Kosovan Serbs are not Swedish-speaking Finns. |
|
lagavulin
said:
|
... This is so true! I agree with A. Kurti on almost everything! Too bad people dont bother listening to him but instead like to be leaded from mafia-like Mr Thaqi and his 1000 petrol stops, or Haradinaj, a Bouncer in Swiss with decades of experience" or Behxhet Pacolli, the filorussian, who thinks can buy all the votes for 50 euros each! Even Surroi is out now! Omg, who am I going to vote for??? Vasil, we are dealing with Serbia for centuries. You started with your Macedonian issue only 15 years ago......wait, theres plenty of time ahead to discuss. First things first! And let me tell you i know plenty of Bulgarians in Macedonia and I know ''real macedonians' who swear to me that they dont understand Serbian language! |
|
Vasil
said:
|
... Where did you get the information that some Macedonians identify as Bulgarian in Macedonia? In Bulgaria, due to assimilation of Macedonians this may happen in some families, but not in Macedonia. This is malicious and untrue. |
|
Write comment









